Robert Pattinson V/S Taylor Lautner
Ésta semana la lucha será entre dos caballeros, conocidos por su interpretación en la popular saga de vampiros, quienes se enfrentan por el amor de una hermosa chica mientras derrochan sensualidad. Son guapos, sexys, jóvenes e irresistibles. ¡Ahhh! ¿Quién ganará?.¡Cuéntanos a continuación cuál es tu favorito!
La saga de vampiros “Crepúsculo” y “Luna Nueva” ha dejado en evidencia la belleza de éstos dos guapetones, cuyo atractivo es totalmente diferente.
Por su lado Robert Pattinson nos encanta con su mística, en una mezcla de chico rudo e introvertido que provoca volvernos locas. Mientras que por su lado, Taylor Lautner, de piel morena, rostro de niño y marcados músculos lo convierten en un hombre increíblemente irresistible.
Es por ello que en la película la pobre Isabelle, papel interpretado por la talentosa actriz Kristen Stewart se siente claramente confundida, frente a éstos adonis que compiten por su amor.
dijo el mayo 6th, 2010 a las 14:56
Taylor lautner Team Jacob
dijo el mayo 7th, 2010 a las 4:02
a mi me encanta robert pattinson lo amo me encanta aun que esté muy joven para mi me encanta es que es tan lindo ahhh
saludos amigos de zona latina
dijo el junio 9th, 2010 a las 15:45
Robert lejos pero el personaje edward
Lo mejor me transmite sentimientos
es genial
dijo el junio 27th, 2010 a las 20:46
EDWARD!!! es muy bonitoooooo
dijo el julio 5th, 2010 a las 18:02
Taylor Lautner es lo mejor… al lado de Rob Pattinson es Lo Mejor ^^ aunque Pattinson no es feo pero el Hombre Lobo Es mi Favorito.Lo Siento Robert pero escojo a Taylor Lautner.
Es como escoger entre Cristiano Ronaldo y Ronaldinho, Pues claramente elijo a Cristiano Ronaldo jajaja.Solo miren la cara de Lautner,es Preciosa.
Bueno solo queria decir eso nada mas adios.
dijo el julio 26th, 2010 a las 11:44
obiooo robert osea edwart es hermoso!!!!
dijo el julio 28th, 2010 a las 17:43
Taylor , es muy lindo ese lobito :$ me encanta !
El otro está más alejado de la mano de Dios xD
dijo el agosto 21st, 2010 a las 15:33
oooh yo amo a taylor lautner(jacob) robert al lado de el es una hormiguitaa osea hello pienselo bnbn! el gana x lejoss bye
dijo el septiembre 17th, 2010 a las 15:01
patinso o como se lllame chao zona atino
los admiro
ojala pudiera estar alla.
dijo el enero 21st, 2011 a las 5:24
Robert Pattinson!!
dijo el febrero 15th, 2011 a las 0:17
Pues estuve un poco confundida un tiempo sobre a quién elegir por que los dos están buenísimos pero al final me decidí por edward es que no se que tiene que te enamora tan fácilmente. Y bueno taylor también es guapo pero no cumple con todas mis expectativas
dijo el junio 11th, 2011 a las 17:01
ooooooooooh xfavor como van a comparar a taylor…con el orrible de robert…..es maj q obio q taylor lautner..es un millon de veces mejor q ese ORRIBLE……!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! de Robert Pattinson
dijo el julio 15th, 2011 a las 21:14
taylor lautner ovio lo amo es un acxtor bn rikooo..
dijo el septiembre 26th, 2011 a las 14:36
Obvio que el mas lindo y sexy es Taylor, es 10 mil veces mejor que Robert.
100% teen Taylor xD
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 4:12
2283676 beers on the wall. sck was here
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 10:30
Pretty good post. I just came across your blog and wanted to say that I have truly loved reading your blog. Well I’ll be coming again and I wish you post again soon.
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 12:01
Hi there! I uncovered your blog on Yahoo. It’s truly thorough and it aided me a whole lot. Keep on the good work!
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 16:00
There is nothing sweeter than his peace when at rest, for there is nothing brisker than his life when in motion. — Christopher Smart, English poet
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 16:15
A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking.
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 20:23
AWD- That music didnt suck at all..I really like ole Delbert.I loved the Andy Griffin Football post too..what the heck happened to that Andy?
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 22:00
You have brought up a very fantastic points, regards for the post.
dijo el septiembre 28th, 2011 a las 23:12
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to mention that I have really loved surfing around your weblog posts. After all I will be subscribing for your feed and I am hoping you write again soon!
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 1:29
I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already
Cheers!
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 7:59
Each of our hearts go over to individuals of Japan in this particular duration of pain.
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 10:14
What i do not understood is definitely how you’re not truly a lot more well-liked than you might be right now. You are very educated. You realize therefore significantly relating to this subject, produced myself consider it from so many varied angles. It’s like men and women are certainly not fascinated unless it is one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your individual stuffs superb.
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 12:20
Don’t have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 17:16
War doesn’t determine who’s right but who’s left.
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 20:26
Beware of people who dislike cats. — Irish proverb
dijo el septiembre 29th, 2011 a las 21:14
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 0:34
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 1:05
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 4:25
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 5:52
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 12:26
Good work, always enjoy reading your point of view.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 12:29
Captain! Someone has snorted all the Dilithium crystals!
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 13:55
You’re the best, wonderful blog… really enjoy it and added into my social bookmarks. Keep up the good work
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 13:57
Cats are smarter than dogs. You can’t get eight cats to pull a sled through snow. — Jeff Valdez
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 17:34
You lost me, friend. I mean, I imagine I get what youre saying. I recognize what you are saying, but you just seem to have forgotten about that there are some other people inside the world who view this matter for what it really is and may not agree with you. You may be turning away many of people who might have been fans of your weblog.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 18:25
People are just filling these commenets up with drivel. It’s so annoying.
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 18:29
You have your identity when you find out, not what you can keep your mind ON, but what you can’t keep your mind OFF. — A.R. Ammons
dijo el septiembre 30th, 2011 a las 21:10
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
dijo el octubre 1st, 2011 a las 0:50
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
dijo el octubre 1st, 2011 a las 2:28
Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any recommendations?
dijo el octubre 1st, 2011 a las 10:13
How can I personalize my blog without making it look like crap?
dijo el octubre 1st, 2011 a las 16:19
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
dijo el octubre 1st, 2011 a las 17:12
They are noteworthy for the possibly of the making of a book..
dijo el octubre 2nd, 2011 a las 15:19
Terry Edwards says:..he looks like an idiot in that suit and tennis shoes.true..and Janeane Garofalo always looks so stunning,eh?..her FaceBook page beckons you
dijo el octubre 2nd, 2011 a las 15:25
dapple@hydrocortisone.cream rel=nofollow>
dijo el octubre 2nd, 2011 a las 18:55
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
dijo el octubre 3rd, 2011 a las 19:23
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
dijo el octubre 3rd, 2011 a las 20:16
A cat is always there when you call her, unless she has something better to do. — Bill Adler
dijo el octubre 3rd, 2011 a las 22:04
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 0:03
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 0:41
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 0:43
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 14:45
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 19:28
If God created something more beautiful than women he kept it to himself. — Simone de Beauvoir
dijo el octubre 4th, 2011 a las 19:33
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.